Use Of Personality Pills Essays - Drugs, Pharmaceutical Drug

Use Of Personality Pills As we go farther and farther into the future, scientific discoveries are becoming more and more magnificent. A plethora of pills that can alter one's mind or personality are readily available by prescription, and yearly more pills are being produced. There is a strong moral dilemma over whether these pills should be taken, or accepted as part of normal life. The belief that one should be able to take a pill to change him or herself intellectually and personally is a very controversial subject. By taking a man-made substance to alter our personality, or increase our intelligence, it is literally changing the person who we are, or were meant to be. I believe that only certain types of illnesses should be able to take such medicines, and should only be able to use them for a period of time. Mental disease differs from endearing quirks only in degree. Says Dr. Larry Siever, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York. It is very hard to make a judgement on whether someone is suitable to take medicine to alter his or her persona. Often a person may feel that they need a change, when in fact they don't. It would be difficult to choose which patients should take medicine, and which should have to continue to suffer. This is one of the sides of the argument against making these drugs available for the public. No one is truly capable of deciding what degree of severity another person is at, and no one should be able to decide who is normal or abnormal. Right now these drugs are only accessible through prescription, but many believe that they should be obtainable for everyone. I believe that we should not change the system we have right now, for it seems to be working. People who strongly believe they need a drug to get by in life, and people with less need for them take these pills, and it does help. This system should not change, because if we made the medicine more available, many more people would take them just to change, even if they don't need to. If the medicine had more restrictions, more people would be suffering. As aforementioned, I believe that only certain illnesses should be able to take such medicine. Patients with severe depression and diseases that cause strong feelings of pain or hate to them or others should be allowed to take these drugs. This would be to protect the patient, and to try to keep them subdued. Simple things such as stage fright, or mood swings should not be changed, because those are a natural part of oneself that does not cause a serious threat. If everyone took a drug for every little thing that they did not like about themselves, it would not end. There would always be one more thing that we wish we could change, one more drug out of reach. This would make the scientific community very wealthy, but could cause chaos in society. If people are so concerned on being different, and changing themselves in the direction of the norm, they should not be taking a pill to be different. They should try to change themselves naturally, whether it is facing their fears, or however it may be. All through history people have survived without these pills, and we have come along very well without them. Why should we change something that is going perfectly well? Another thing to ponder about is if everyone starts taking these pills, then certain people may not accomplish the things that they could have in life. Many people who have affected the world have been mentally ill, and they have left great impacts on the world. By using these pills, it could inhibit their progress in life, or their progress in the different fields that they were meant to succeed in. If T.S. Eliot had been extroverted, he might have not been such a creative person, for he might have gone out in life and socialized more, rather than sitting alone and focusing on his thoughts. The risks that would be taken to use these drugs are far too high. We are who we are for a reason,

a starry night essays

a starry night essays Starry Night Vincent Van Gogh's Starry Night is a marvelous painting in which Van Gogh paints a picture that is colorful and descriptive. This painting can be described as mysterious and intriguing. It can signify a variety of moods, objects, and atmosphere. Van Gogh portrays a small French town located in the countryside. This town is characterized by rolling mountains, big starry sky, small houses, green fields, a large tree, and a church. He uses these details to paint a story full of color and intrigue. Van Gogh uses oil to paint this work on a 72cm x 92cm canvas board. Oil provides a semi-blurred texture. He uses different colors like blue, black, orange, yellow, purple, green, and violet. He paints the sky purple and dark blue to signify the evening. He uses orange and yellow for the bright stars in the sky. The mountains that border the town are colored a dark blue and are masked by a tree, which is colored black. Green is applied for the grass and other various plants and veg etation. He uses a vast array of colors to paint the houses and buildings in the village. In the Starry Night mood and description play a major part. The evening sky is exposed with vibrant flames of light streaming through the sky. One person might think that huge comets are hurtling toward the earth, signaling the end of the world, while another could guess that Van Gogh was painting a scene where large stars and the navy blue sky are brightening the medieval type landscape. He creates a painting that shows the beauty of the countryside. Looking up at the sky the bright, yellowish-white stars twirl about as if the wind currents direct them. The wind itself is blowing fast and swift, directed by the easterly currents from the ocean. Right below the sky lie the rolling mountains that overlook the village. Their presence brings peace and quiet to the French village. The mountains provide shade and protection from afar. Van Gogh also includes a large cypress ...

Book literature review Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Book literature review - Essay Example he gives in his book are truly awe inspiring. The entrepreneurial group functions as a venture capital company, penetrating into sectors including telecom (mobile telephony), travel and tourism, financial services (banking and insurance), transportation (airline), social and environment, music (most of all!) and other media related – media, publishing and also retailing. The business is spread across the globe with operations in Africa, Asia, Europe, United States, Canada etc. The core idea is to leverage the brand Virgin. The group does not own all businesses by itself fully and each of these businesses operates as a separate entity with the owner holding varied interest positions. The book covers over a 300 pages, and is partitioned into 8 areas – these eight sections cover each of the basic building blocks that put life in to the business, namely, People; Brand; Delivery; Learning from Mistakes and Setbacks; Innovation; Entrepreneurs and Leadership; and lastly, Social Responsibility. The book is about how Sir Richard Branson, as a leader of the vessel carried it into the sea. All points of views presented are from his own experiences and it never talks about the approach that â€Å"one size fits all†. So, all in all, we can say this book is about leadership and the motivation to march forward, expand the business portfolio - geographically and the product offering wise. People - In the analysis we will apply all these chapters and what Richard Branson has encapsulated in his books to his very own organization. To start off with, people who are an important resource of the organization and without whom the business is just closed walls. Thus, at Virgin the environment is full of life; like all organizations Virgin Group employees people that are intelligent. One of the focus is on increasing worker participation and motivation by developing a sense of responsibility and ownership amongst themselves – parties, fun